1996 Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Brakes

Brakes leads by volume: 47 of 155 complaints (30%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Airbags & Restraints include more reported injuries (9) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed fell from 169 in 1995 to 155 in 1996.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 4 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category1995199619971998vs. 1996 Midsize Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)3,100–3,4502,950–3,4502,950–3,4502,950–3,300
Combined MPG18–2018–2118–2119–21
City / Highway MPG15–17 / 24–2615–18 / 24–2615–18 / 24–2616–17 / 25–27
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)444–494423–494423–494423–468
Complaints filed169155164100Not compared
Recalls issued5335Not compared
Crash-involved complaints27141413Not compared
Fire-involved complaints1118Not compared
Injuries reported15101011Not compared
Deaths reported1007Not compared
Configurations compared3223

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1996 Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo have?

3 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1996 Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo?

Brakes: 47 of 155 NHTSA complaints (30%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1996 Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo get?

EPA rates it 18–21 MPG combined across 2 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1996 Chevrolet Lumina/Monte Carlo?

EPA estimates $2,950–$3,450 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (2)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd63.1LFront-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize Cars18 mpg (high)26 mpg (high)21 mpg (high)$2,950 (low)423 g/mi (low)
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd63.4LFront-Wheel DriveRegularMidsize Cars15 mpg (low)24 mpg (low)18 mpg (low)$3,450 (high)494 g/mi (high)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine401000
Transmission & Drivetrain100000
Fuel System171000
Electrical410000
Brakes476000
Steering81100
Suspension, Wheels & Tires70000
Airbags & Restraints118090
Driver Assistance & Speed Control60000
Body, Seats & Latches62020
Visibility & Lighting40000
Other161000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (3)

  • FUEL SYSTEM, OTHER:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY:PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES · Campaign 07E021000 · Mar 12, 2007

    Defect: CERTAIN DELPHI FUEL PRESSURE REGULATORS, P/NOS. FP10020-11B1, FP10026-11B1, AND FP10027-11B1, SOLD AFTER JANUARY 9, 2007, AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE UNIVERSAL PRESSURE REGULATORS (UPR) WERE PRODUCED WITHOUT AN O'RING AND RETAINER.

    Consequence: FUEL MAY LEAK, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A FIRE.

    Remedy: DELPHI WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE UPR FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 23, 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT DELPHI AT 877-411-8770.

  • SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS · Campaign 01I014000 · Jan 7, 2002

    Defect: THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: 1995-1999 CHEVROLET MONTE CARLO Z34 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE BRAKING PERFORMANCE IN WET WEATHER OR WET ROAD CONDITIONS IS REDUCED MORE THAN A DRIVER WOULD EXPECT.

    Consequence: THE BRAKING COULD FEEL DELAYED MOMENTARILY WHEN LIGHT OR MODERATE FORCE IS APPLIED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL WHILE DRIVING ON WET ROADS OR AFTER GOING THROUGH A CAR WASH.

    Remedy: DEALER WILL MODIFY THE FRONT FENDER LINERS TO REMOVE A PORTION OF THE CLOSEOUT PANELS IN THE FRONT WHEEL WELLS AT NO CHARGE TO THE CONSUMER. THIS SERVICE WILL BE AVAILABLE THROUGH AUGUST 2004.

  • SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:VACUUM · Campaign 96V122000 · Jul 8, 1996

    Defect: THESE VEHICLES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH ONE OF THE FOUR BRAKE BOOSTER TABS NOT PROPERLY LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF DASH REINFORCEMENT ASSEMBLY.

    Consequence: IF THIS CONDITION WERE PRESENT IN A SITUATION WHERE STOPPING DISTANCES WERE SMALL, A VEHICLE CRASH COULD OCCUR.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR PROPER BOOSTER INSTALLATION. BOOSTERS FOUND TO BE IMPROPERLY LOCATED WILL BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED PROPERLY.