2002 Suzuki Aerio

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Suspension, Wheels & Tires

Suspension, Wheels & Tires leads by volume: 5 of 13 complaints (38%) mention it.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.Also cataloged for 2002: 2 configuration(s) of a different vehicle class, excluded from the comparison bar only (but included in the figures above).
Category200220032004vs. 2002 Compact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,400–2,5002,500–2,7002,600–2,700
Combined MPG25–2623–2523–24
City / Highway MPG22–23 / 28–3021–23 / 26–2921–22 / 26–28
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)342–355355–386370–386
Complaints filed133614Not compared
Recalls issued221Not compared
Crash-involved complaints233Not compared
Fire-involved complaints010Not compared
Injuries reported061Not compared
Deaths reported000Not compared
Configurations compared233

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 2002 Suzuki Aerio have?

2 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 2002 Suzuki Aerio?

Suspension, Wheels & Tires: 5 of 13 NHTSA complaints (38%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 2002 Suzuki Aerio get?

EPA rates it 25–26 MPG combined.

How much does it cost to fuel a 2002 Suzuki Aerio?

EPA estimates $2,400–$2,500 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg (high)28 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 2Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg (high)30 mpg (high)26 mpg (high)$2,400 (low)342 g/mi (low)
Configuration 3Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Station Wagons22 mpg (low)28 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 4Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Station Wagons23 mpg (high)29 mpg25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine20000
Transmission & Drivetrain10000
Fuel System00000
Electrical10000
Brakes30000
Steering00000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires52000
Airbags & Restraints00000
Driver Assistance & Speed Control00000
Body, Seats & Latches20000
Visibility & Lighting10000
Other00000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (2)

  • POWER TRAIN:MANUAL TRANSMISSION · Campaign 07V307000 · Jul 19, 2007

    Defect: ON CERTAIN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 5-SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS, DUE TO IMPROPER SHAPE OF THE CLIP, THE RETAINING CLIP THAT KEEPS THE GEAR SHIFT CABLE ATTACHED TO THE GEAR SHIFT LEVER CAN CONTACT THE GEAR SHIFT LEVER HOUSING IF EXCESSIVE LATERAL FORCE IS APPLIED WHEN SHIFTING TO FIRST GEAR.

    Consequence: REPEATED SHIFTING IN THIS MANNER CAN EVENTUALLY CAUSE THE RETAINING CLIP TO BREAK. IF THE RETAINING CLIP BREAKS, THE SHIFT CABLE CAN BECOME DISCONNECTED FROM THE SHIFT LEVER, RESULTING IN LOSS OF THE ABILITY TO CHANGE TRANSMISSION GEARS.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE GEAR SHIFT CABLE RETAINING CLIP WITH A CLIP THAT HAS A DIFFERENT SHAPE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 13, 2007. OWNERS MAY CONTACT AMERICAN SUZUKI AT 1-800-934-0934.

  • VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD · Campaign 03V223000 · Jun 18, 2003

    Defect: CERTAIN PASSENGER (111 MY 2002 ESTEEM, 777 MY 2002 AERIO, 2,368 MY 2003 AERIO) AND SPORT UTILITY (324 MY 2002 GRAND VITARA, 274 MY 2003 GRAND VITARA, 684 MY 2002 GRAND VITARA XL-7, AND 781 MY 2003 GRAND VITARA XL-7) VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 212, 'WINDSHIELD MOUNTING." THE WINDSHIELD MAY NOT BE PROPERLY SECURED TO THE VEHICLE BODY DUE TO INSUFFICIENT ADHESION BETWEEN THE PAINT APPLIED DURING THE SECOND-STAGE PAINTING PROCESS AND THE PAINT APPLIED DURING FINAL-STAGE PAINTING.

    Consequence: IF THE WINDSHIELD IS NOT PROPERLY SECURED, IT MAY SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE DURING A CRASH WHICH COULD RESULT IN THE EJECTION OF UNBELTED OCCUPANTS, INCREASING THE RISK OF SEVERE INJURY OR DEATH.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THESE VEHICLES. VEHICLES THAT ARE FOUND TO HAVE INSUFFICIENT PAINT ADHESION WILL EITHER HAVE THE PROBLEM REMEDIED BY REPAINTING, OR WILL BE REPLACED, OR REPURCHASED AND DESTROYED. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN ON JULY 8, 2003. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT SUZUKI AT 1-800-934-0934.