2002 Ford Escort

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Engine

Engine leads by volume: 14 of 45 complaints (31%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Airbags & Restraints include more reported injuries (6) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed fell from 86 in 2001 to 45 in 2002.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 4 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.Also cataloged for 2002: 1 configuration(s) of a different vehicle class, excluded from the comparison bar only (but included in the figures above).
Category2000200120022003vs. 2002 Subcompact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,300–2,5002,400–2,5002,400–2,5002,500
Combined MPG25–2725–2625–2625
City / Highway MPG22–24 / 30–3222–23 / 30–3222–23 / 30–3223 / 28–30
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)329–355342–355342–355355
Complaints filed105864516Not compared
Recalls issued2111Not compared
Crash-involved complaints221552Not compared
Fire-involved complaints2310Not compared
Injuries reported217122Not compared
Deaths reported0000Not compared
Configurations compared2222

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 2002 Ford Escort have?

1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 2002 Ford Escort?

Engine: 14 of 45 NHTSA complaints (31%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 2002 Ford Escort get?

EPA rates it 25–26 MPG combined.

How much does it cost to fuel a 2002 Ford Escort?

EPA estimates $2,400–$2,500 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (3)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars22 mpg (low)30 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 2Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars23 mpg (high)31 mpg26 mpg (high)$2,400 (low)342 g/mi (low)
Configuration 3Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg (high)32 mpg (high)26 mpg (high)$2,400 (low)342 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine140000
Transmission & Drivetrain101000
Fuel System20000
Electrical20000
Brakes42050
Steering30000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires91000
Airbags & Restraints42160
Driver Assistance & Speed Control11050
Body, Seats & Latches30010
Visibility & Lighting10000
Other00000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (1)

  • SEAT BELTS:FRONT · Campaign 04E048000 · Jul 13, 2004

    Defect: CERTAIN TRW DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT BELTS MANUFACTURED ON DECEMBER 6 AND 9, 2002, FOR USE AS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR 1997 FORD ESCORT 4-DOOR AND STATION WAGON PLATFORM VEHICLES, FORD'S P/N F7CZ54611B09AAC. THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES EXHIBIT A NO-LOCK CONDITION WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES.

    Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE RESTRAINT SYSTEM MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT, WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.

    Remedy: TRW WILL NOTIFY THE CUSTOMERS WHO PURCHASED THE REPLACEMENT SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 27, 2004.