2002 Saturn SL

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Electrical

Electrical leads by volume: 43 of 131 complaints (33%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Airbags & Restraints include more reported injuries (7) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed rose from 111 in 2001 to 131 in 2002.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category200020012002vs. 2002 Compact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,150–2,4002,150–2,4002,150–2,400
Combined MPG26–2926–2926–29
City / Highway MPG22–25 / 32–3622–25 / 32–3622–25 / 32–36
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)306–342306–342306–342
Complaints filed148111131Not compared
Recalls issued831Not compared
Crash-involved complaints101420Not compared
Fire-involved complaints305Not compared
Injuries reported101016Not compared
Deaths reported200Not compared
Configurations compared444

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 2002 Saturn SL have?

1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 2002 Saturn SL?

Electrical: 43 of 131 NHTSA complaints (33%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 2002 Saturn SL get?

EPA rates it 26–29 MPG combined across 4 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 2002 Saturn SL?

EPA estimates $2,150–$2,400 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars24 mpg34 mpg27 mpg$2,300329 g/mi
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars22 mpg (low)32 mpg (low)26 mpg (low)$2,400 (high)342 g/mi (high)
Configuration 3Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg34 mpg27 mpg$2,300329 g/mi
Configuration 4Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars25 mpg (high)36 mpg (high)29 mpg (high)$2,150 (low)306 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine211010
Transmission & Drivetrain220100
Fuel System40000
Electrical432310
Brakes101000
Steering83020
Suspension, Wheels & Tires81010
Airbags & Restraints108170
Driver Assistance & Speed Control10000
Body, Seats & Latches136060
Visibility & Lighting81010
Other41010

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (1)

  • EXTERIOR LIGHTING · Campaign 09E012000 · Apr 7, 2009

    Defect: SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

    Consequence: DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.

    Remedy: SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.