1998 Eagle Talon

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Brakes

Brakes leads by volume: 4 of 17 complaints (24%) mention it.

Complaints filed fell from 24 in 1997 to 17 in 1998.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category199619971998vs. 1998 Subcompact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,700–4,1002,700–4,1002,600–4,100
Combined MPG19–2419–2419–24
City / Highway MPG17–21 / 23–2917–21 / 23–3017–20 / 23–30
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)370–468370–468370–468
Complaints filed442417Not compared
Recalls issued544Not compared
Crash-involved complaints011Not compared
Fire-involved complaints000Not compared
Injuries reported020Not compared
Deaths reported000Not compared
Configurations compared6612

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1998 Eagle Talon have?

4 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1998 Eagle Talon?

Brakes: 4 of 17 NHTSA complaints (24%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1998 Eagle Talon get?

EPA rates it 19–24 MPG combined across 12 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1998 Eagle Talon?

EPA estimates $2,600–$4,100 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (12)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars18 mpg28 mpg22 mpg$2,850404 g/mi
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars18 mpg25 mpg20 mpg$3,900444 g/mi
Configuration 3Automatic 4-spd42.0L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars17 mpg (low)23 mpg (low)19 mpg (low)$4,100 (high)468 g/mi (high)
Configuration 4Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars18 mpg28 mpg22 mpg$2,850404 g/mi
Configuration 5Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars18 mpg25 mpg20 mpg$3,900444 g/mi
Configuration 6Automatic 4-spd42.0L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars17 mpg (low)23 mpg (low)19 mpg (low)$4,100 (high)468 g/mi (high)
Configuration 7Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars20 mpg (high)30 mpg (high)24 mpg (high)$2,600 (low)370 g/mi (low)
Configuration 8Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars20 mpg (high)29 mpg23 mpg$3,350386 g/mi
Configuration 9Manual 5-spd42.0L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars19 mpg26 mpg21 mpg$3,700423 g/mi
Configuration 10Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars20 mpg (high)30 mpg (high)23 mpg$2,700386 g/mi
Configuration 11Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars20 mpg (high)29 mpg23 mpg$3,350386 g/mi
Show 1 more configuration
The remaining EPA-rated configurations on this page.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 12Manual 5-spd42.0L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DrivePremiumSubcompact Cars19 mpg26 mpg21 mpg$3,700423 g/mi

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine30000
Transmission & Drivetrain10000
Fuel System00000
Electrical10000
Brakes41000
Steering20000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires20000
Airbags & Restraints20000
Driver Assistance & Speed Control31000
Body, Seats & Latches20000
Visibility & Lighting00000
Other00000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (4)

  • FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:FUEL PUMP · Campaign 07E055000 · Jul 26, 2007

    Defect: CERTAIN AIRTEX FUEL PUMP MODULE ASSEMBLIES, P/N E7081H, SOLD FOR USE AS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. THE WALL OF THE FLARED FITTING OF THE FUEL PUMP IS NOT THICK ENOUGH TO PREVENT THE MATING THREADED FITTINGS FROM BOTTOMING OUT BEFORE AN ADEQUATE SEAL IS ACHIEVED. THIS CONDITION MAY RESULT IN LEAKAGE OF FUEL AT THE CONNECTION OF THE VEHICLE FUEL LINE AND THE FUEL PUMP MODULE ASSEMBLY.

    Consequence: IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FUEL LEAK COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.

    Remedy: AIRTEX WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL PUMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING JULY 2007. OWNERS CAN CONTACT AIRTEX AUTOMOTIVE AT 800-880-3056.

  • SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:LOWER BALL JOINT · Campaign 00V421002 · Mar 12, 2001

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. IF THE RUBBER BOOTS ON THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINTS OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION WERE DAMAGED DURING ASSEMBLY, DIRT AND WATER CAN INTRUDE. ALSO, MMC HAS ADDED THE POTENTIAL OF LEAKING MOISTURE, WHICH CAN CAUSE THE BALL STUD TO CORRODE.

    Consequence: THIS CONDITION COULD CAUSE THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINT TO SEPARATE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH. THIS CAMPAIGN SUPERCEDES MMC'S PREVIOUS SAFETY RECALL CAMPAIGN, SEE 99V-066.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE LOWER LATERAL ARM BALL JOINT FOR WEAR. BALL JOINTS THAT EXHIBIT WEAR BEYOND THE ESTABLISHED TOLERANCE WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEWLY DESIGNED LATERAL ARM BALL JOINTS. BALL JOINTS THAT ARE WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED TOLERANCE WILL BE CLEANED AND A SPECIAL SEALANT WILL BE APPLIED TO PREVENT INTRUSION OF MOISTURE.

  • POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION · Campaign 98V069002 · Jun 16, 1998

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. LOCKUP OF THE TRANSFER CASE CAN OCCUR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT LUBRICATION.

    Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLES FOR ADEQUACY OF THE TRANSFER CASE OIL VOLUME, TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AND OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION OF THE TRANSFER CASE MECHANISM. IF OIL VOLUME IS INSUFFICIENT, THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF OIL WILL BE ADDED. IF THERE IS TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AFFECTED COMPONENTS WILL BE REPLACED. IF THE TRANSFER CASE SHOWS OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION, THE TRANSFER CASE WILL BE REPLACED.

  • VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL · Campaign 98V045002 · Mar 19, 1998

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE DASH PANEL PAD CAN SHIFT INTERFERRING WITH THE THROTTLE CABLE CONTROL.

    Consequence: THE THROTTLE CABLE CONTROL WOULD NOT RETURN TO IDLE INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL REMOVE A PORTION OF THE DASH PANEL PAD SO IT CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE THROTTLE CABLE CONTROL.