1999 Saturn SL

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Engine

Engine leads by volume: 47 of 178 complaints (26%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Airbags & Restraints include more reported injuries (13) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed rose from 168 in 1998 to 178 in 1999.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 5 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category19971998199920002001vs. 1999 Compact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,250–2,5002,250–2,5002,150–2,4002,150–2,4002,150–2,400
Combined MPG25–2825–2826–2926–2926–29
City / Highway MPG21–24 / 31–3621–24 / 31–3622–25 / 32–3622–25 / 32–3622–25 / 32–36
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)317–355317–355306–342306–342306–342
Complaints filed226168178148111Not compared
Recalls issued31283Not compared
Crash-involved complaints3023261014Not compared
Fire-involved complaints92130Not compared
Injuries reported2931201010Not compared
Deaths reported01020Not compared
Configurations compared44444

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1999 Saturn SL have?

2 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1999 Saturn SL?

Engine: 47 of 178 NHTSA complaints (26%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1999 Saturn SL get?

EPA rates it 26–29 MPG combined across 4 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1999 Saturn SL?

EPA estimates $2,150–$2,400 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg33 mpg27 mpg$2,300329 g/mi
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars22 mpg (low)32 mpg (low)26 mpg (low)$2,400 (high)342 g/mi (high)
Configuration 3Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg34 mpg27 mpg$2,300329 g/mi
Configuration 4Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars25 mpg (high)36 mpg (high)29 mpg (high)$2,150 (low)306 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine470100
Transmission & Drivetrain221010
Fuel System40000
Electrical201040
Brakes344010
Steering70000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires212000
Airbags & Restraints30150130
Driver Assistance & Speed Control71010
Body, Seats & Latches127060
Visibility & Lighting70000
Other51010

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (2)

  • EXTERIOR LIGHTING · Campaign 09E012000 · Apr 7, 2009

    Defect: SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

    Consequence: DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.

    Remedy: SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.

  • SEAT BELTS:FRONT:ANCHORAGE · Campaign 99V280000 · Oct 26, 1999

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE VEHICLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 210, "SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY ANCHORAGES." SOME OF THE VEHICLES WERE PRODUCED WITH SEAT BELT SHOULDER GUIDE ANCHOR BOLTS THAT WERE NOT ADEQUATELY TIGHTENED AT THE CENTER PILLAR AND COULD FALL OUT, MAKING THE SEAT BELT INOPERATIVE.

    Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE SEAT OCCUPANT MAY NOT BE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THESE VEHICLES FOR PROPER INSTALLATION AND TORQUE OF THE SEAT BELT SHOULDER GUIDE ANCHOR BOLTS.