1996 Saturn SL

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Engine

Engine leads by volume: 64 of 287 complaints (22%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Steering include more deaths (1) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed fell from 355 in 1995 to 287 in 1996.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 4 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category1995199619971998vs. 1996 Compact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,250–2,5002,150–2,5002,250–2,5002,250–2,500
Combined MPG25–2825–2925–2825–28
City / Highway MPG21–24 / 31–3621–25 / 31–3621–24 / 31–3621–24 / 31–36
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)317–355306–355317–355317–355
Complaints filed355287226168Not compared
Recalls issued3231Not compared
Crash-involved complaints77503023Not compared
Fire-involved complaints6292Not compared
Injuries reported58452931Not compared
Deaths reported0101Not compared
Configurations compared4444

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1996 Saturn SL have?

2 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1996 Saturn SL?

Engine: 64 of 287 NHTSA complaints (22%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1996 Saturn SL get?

EPA rates it 25–29 MPG combined across 4 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1996 Saturn SL?

EPA estimates $2,150–$2,500 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars21 mpg (low)31 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars23 mpg33 mpg27 mpg$2,300329 g/mi
Configuration 3Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars22 mpg32 mpg26 mpg$2,400342 g/mi
Configuration 4Manual 5-spd41.9LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars25 mpg (high)36 mpg (high)29 mpg (high)$2,150 (low)306 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine642210
Transmission & Drivetrain374010
Fuel System80000
Electrical400010
Brakes449070
Steering207021
Suspension, Wheels & Tires223030
Airbags & Restraints25140170
Driver Assistance & Speed Control174070
Body, Seats & Latches31120130
Visibility & Lighting190020
Other90010

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (2)

  • EXTERIOR LIGHTING · Campaign 09E012000 · Apr 7, 2009

    Defect: SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

    Consequence: DECREASED LIGHTING VISIBILITY MAY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.

    Remedy: SABERSPORT WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER A FULL REFUND FOR THE NONCOMPLIANT COMBINATION LAMPS. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 11, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT SABERSPORT AT 1-909-598-7589.

  • STEERING:GEAR BOX (OTHER THAN RACK AND PINION) · Campaign 97V138000 · Aug 29, 1997

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH MANUAL STEERING. THE PINION BEARING CAGE IN THE STEERING GEAR CAN SEPARATE UNDER HIGH STEERING SYSTEM LOAD CONDITIONS, SUCH AS PARKING LOT OR SIMILAR LOW SPEED MANEUVERS.

    Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PINION GEAR DISENGAGING FROM THE RACK CAUSING A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE MANUAL STEERING GEAR ASSEMBLY.