1995 Mitsubishi Expo
The Verdict
Worst problem area
Transmission & Drivetrain
Transmission & Drivetrain leads by volume: 5 of 11 complaints (45%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Airbags & Restraints include more reported injuries (2) than those mentioning any other identified area.
Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology
Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History
| Category | 1995 | 1996 | vs. 1995 Midsize-Large Station Wagons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel cost ($) | 2,850–3,450 | 3,100 | |
| Combined MPG | 18–22 | 20 | |
| City / Highway MPG | 17–19 / 21–25 | 18 / 24 | |
| CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi) | 404–494 | 444 | |
| Complaints filed | 11 | 1 | |
| Recalls issued | 1 | 1 | |
| Crash-involved complaints | 1 | 0 | |
| Fire-involved complaints | 0 | 0 | |
| Injuries reported | 2 | 0 | |
| Deaths reported | 0 | 0 | |
| Configurations compared | 6 | 1 |
Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.
Common questions
How many recalls does the 1995 Mitsubishi Expo have?
1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.
What is the most common complaint about the 1995 Mitsubishi Expo?
Transmission & Drivetrain: 5 of 11 NHTSA complaints (45%) mention it.
What gas mileage does the 1995 Mitsubishi Expo get?
EPA rates it 18–22 MPG combined across 6 configurations.
How much does it cost to fuel a 1995 Mitsubishi Expo?
EPA estimates $2,850–$3,450 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.
Similar Vehicles
EPA-Rated Configurations (6)
| Configuration | Transmission | Cylinders | Displacement | Drivetrain | Fuel Type | Vehicle Class | City | Highway | Combined | Annual Fuel Cost | CO₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration 1 | Automatic 4-spd | 4 | 2.4L | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 17 mpg (low) | 21 mpg (low) | 18 mpg (low) | $3,450 (high) | 494 g/mi (high) |
| Configuration 2 | Automatic 4-spd | 4 | 2.4L | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 18 mpg | 24 mpg | 20 mpg | $3,100 | 444 g/mi |
| Configuration 3 | Manual 5-spd | 4 | 2.4L | 4-Wheel or All-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 18 mpg | 22 mpg | 20 mpg | $3,100 | 444 g/mi |
| Configuration 4 | Manual 5-spd | 4 | 2.4L | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 19 mpg (high) | 25 mpg (high) | 22 mpg (high) | $2,850 (low) | 404 g/mi (low) |
| Configuration 5 | Automatic 4-spd | 4 | 2.4L | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 18 mpg | 24 mpg | 20 mpg | $3,100 | 444 g/mi |
| Configuration 6 | Manual 5-spd | 4 | 2.4L | Front-Wheel Drive | Regular | Midsize-Large Station Wagons | 19 mpg (high) | 25 mpg (high) | 22 mpg (high) | $2,850 (low) | 404 g/mi (low) |
Complaints by Category
| Category | Complaints | Crash-Involved | Fire-Involved | Injuries | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Transmission & Drivetrain | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fuel System | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Electrical | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brakes | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steering | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suspension, Wheels & Tires | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Airbags & Restraints | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Driver Assistance & Speed Control | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Body, Seats & Latches | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Visibility & Lighting | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.
Recalls (1)
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION · Campaign 98V168000 · Jul 29, 1998
Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: ALL WHEEL DRIVE PASSENGER VEHICLES. LOCKUP OF THE TRANSFER CASE CAN OCCUR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT LUBRICATION.
Consequence: THIS CONDITION CAN CAUSE A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE VEHICLES FOR ADEQUACY OF THE TRANSFER CASE OIL VOLUME, TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AND OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION OF THE TRANSFER CASE MECHANISM. IF OIL VOLUME IS INSUFFICIENT, THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF OIL WILL BE ADDED. IF THERE IS TRANSFER CASE OIL LEAKAGE, AFFECTED COMPONENTS WILL BE REPLACED. IF THE TRANSFER CASE SHOWS OPERATIONAL DEGRADATION, THE TRANSFER CASE WILL BE REPLACED.