1999 Mercury Tracer

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Electrical

Electrical leads by volume: 6 of 20 complaints (30%) mention it.

Complaints filed fell from 44 in 1998 to 20 in 1999.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.Also cataloged for 1999: 2 configuration(s) of a different vehicle class, excluded from the comparison bar only (but included in the figures above).
Category199719981999vs. 1999 Compact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)2,250–2,4002,250–2,5002,250–2,500
Combined MPG26–2825–2825–28
City / Highway MPG23–24 / 31–3422–24 / 31–3422–24 / 31–34
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)317–342317–355317–355
Complaints filed1424420Not compared
Recalls issued211Not compared
Crash-involved complaints1536Not compared
Fire-involved complaints1712Not compared
Injuries reported1731Not compared
Deaths reported100Not compared
Configurations compared222

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1999 Mercury Tracer have?

1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1999 Mercury Tracer?

Electrical: 6 of 20 NHTSA complaints (30%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1999 Mercury Tracer get?

EPA rates it 25–28 MPG combined.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1999 Mercury Tracer?

EPA estimates $2,250–$2,500 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars22 mpg (low)31 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 2Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularCompact Cars24 mpg (high)34 mpg (high)28 mpg (high)$2,250 (low)317 g/mi (low)
Configuration 3Automatic 4-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Station Wagons22 mpg (low)31 mpg (low)25 mpg (low)$2,500 (high)355 g/mi (high)
Configuration 4Manual 5-spd42.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSmall Station Wagons24 mpg (high)34 mpg (high)28 mpg (high)$2,250 (low)317 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine10000
Transmission & Drivetrain21000
Fuel System11010
Electrical62110
Brakes51010
Steering11000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires31100
Airbags & Restraints42010
Driver Assistance & Speed Control10000
Body, Seats & Latches10000
Visibility & Lighting31010
Other11000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (1)

  • SEAT BELTS:FRONT · Campaign 04E048000 · Jul 13, 2004

    Defect: CERTAIN TRW DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT BELTS MANUFACTURED ON DECEMBER 6 AND 9, 2002, FOR USE AS REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT FOR 1997 FORD ESCORT 4-DOOR AND STATION WAGON PLATFORM VEHICLES, FORD'S P/N F7CZ54611B09AAC. THE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES EXHIBIT A NO-LOCK CONDITION WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 209, SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES.

    Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE RESTRAINT SYSTEM MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO THE SEAT OCCUPANT, WHICH MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.

    Remedy: TRW WILL NOTIFY THE CUSTOMERS WHO PURCHASED THE REPLACEMENT SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 27, 2004.