1998 GMC Yukon

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Brakes

Brakes leads by volume: 21 of 80 complaints (26%) mention it. Complaints mentioning Visibility & Lighting include more deaths (3) than those mentioning any other identified area.

Complaints filed fell from 133 in 1997 to 80 in 1998.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 5 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.Also cataloged for 1998: 2 configuration(s) of a different vehicle class, excluded from the comparison bar only (but included in the figures above).
Category19961997199819992000vs. 1998 Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD
Annual fuel cost ($)4,450–5,9504,150–5,9504,450–5,9504,450–5,9504,150–4,800
Combined MPG14–1514–1513–1513–1513–15
City / Highway MPG12–14 / 16–1712–14 / 16–1712–13 / 15–1711–13 / 15–1711–13 / 15–18
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)635–679592–679635–684635–684592–684
Complaints filed7013380231184Not compared
Recalls issued41329Not compared
Crash-involved complaints8952016Not compared
Fire-involved complaints13120Not compared
Injuries reported11241213Not compared
Deaths reported00301Not compared
Configurations compared33224

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1998 GMC Yukon have?

3 NHTSA recall campaigns as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1998 GMC Yukon?

Brakes: 21 of 80 NHTSA complaints (26%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1998 GMC Yukon get?

EPA rates it 13–15 MPG combined.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1998 GMC Yukon?

EPA estimates $4,450–$5,950 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (4)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 4-spd85.7LRear-Wheel DriveRegularSpecial Purpose Vehicle 2WD13 mpg (high)17 mpg (high)14 mpg$4,450 (low)635 g/mi (low)
Configuration 2Automatic 4-spd85.7LRear-Wheel DriveRegularSpecial Purpose Vehicle 2WD12 mpg (low)16 mpg14 mpg$4,450 (low)635 g/mi (low)
Configuration 3Automatic 4-spd85.7L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DriveRegularSpecial Purpose Vehicle 4WD12 mpg (low)15 mpg (low)13 mpg (low)$4,800684 g/mi (high)
Configuration 4Automatic 4-spd86.5L4-Wheel or All-Wheel DriveDieselSpecial Purpose Vehicle 4WD13 mpg (high)17 mpg (high)15 mpg (high)$5,950 (high)679 g/mi

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine30000
Transmission & Drivetrain80000
Fuel System50100
Electrical20000
Brakes213020
Steering110000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires60000
Airbags & Restraints22020
Driver Assistance & Speed Control20000
Body, Seats & Latches50000
Visibility & Lighting160003
Other51000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (3)

  • FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE · Campaign 06E043000 · May 22, 2006

    Defect: CERTAIN REPLACEMENT FUEL FILTERS, FRAM BRAND NAME P/N G3727, WITH DATE CODES X52911 THROUGH X60801 SEQUENTIALLY OR X600141 AND A MEXICO COUNTRY OR ORIGIN MARKING ON THE FUEL FILTER HOUSING MANUFACTURED FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005, THROUGH MARCH 21, 2006, SOLD FOR USE ON THE VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE AND ON CERTAIN SCHOOL BUSES. (TO SEE THE SCHOOL BUS ENGINE SIZES, CLICK ON "DOCUMENT SEARCH" AND THEN "BUS APPLICATIONS"). THE CONNECTOR ON THE FUEL FILTER WAS NOT MANUFACTURED TO HONEYWELL'S SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE O-RING MAY NOT SEAT CORRECTLY ON THE FUEL LINE.

    Consequence: THIS CONDITION MAY CAUSE AN INADEQUATE SEAL AT THE CONNECTION, POTENTIALLY LEADING TO A FUEL LEAK. IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, A FIRE COULD OCCUR.

    Remedy: HONEYWELL WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE FUEL FILTERS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON OCTOBER 18, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FRAM CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-800-890-2075 (OPTION 1).

  • SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DISC:ROTOR · Campaign 98V033000 · Feb 25, 1998

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY PICKUP TRUCKS AND MULTI-PURPOSE PASSENGER VEHICLES. ONE OR BOTH FRONT BRAKE ROTOR/HUBS WERE BUILT WITH AN OUT-OF-SPECIFICATION GRAY IRON THAT CAN FAIL DURING THE LIFE OF THE VEHICLE.

    Consequence: IF A DRIVER CONTINUES TO DRIVE WITH A CRACKED ROTOR, THE CRACKS COULD CONTINUE AROUND THE WHEEL MOUNTING BOLT CIRCLE AND ULTIMATELY RESULT IN A WHEEL SEPARATION.

    Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE ROTORS FOR A CORE DATE OF "287" AND, IF FOUND, REPLACE THE ROTOR.

  • STEERING:GEAR BOX (OTHER THAN RACK AND PINION) · Campaign 97V142000 · Aug 29, 1997

    Defect: VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: LIGHT DUTY EXTENDED-CAB PICKUP TRUCKS AND 4-DOOR UTILITY TRUCKS. THE LOWER STEERING SHAFT TO STEERING GEAR PINCH BOLT IS "FINGER LOOSE" OR MISSING ALLOWING THE BOLT TO LOOSEN AND FALL OUT. THE STEERING SHAFT YOKE CAN WEAR CAUSING AN OFF CENTER STEERING WHEEL.

    Consequence: RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN THE CHASSIS AND CAB CAN CAUSE THE STEERING SHAFT TO SEPARATE FROM THE STEERING GEAR. THIS CONDITION CAN RESULT IN A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.

    Remedy: DEALERS ARE ARRANGING TO HAVE THE VEHICLES INVOLVED TOWED TO THE DEALERSHIP AND ALTERNATE TRANSPORTATION IS BEING ARRANGED FOR OWNERS. DEALERS WILL THEN INSPECT THE VEHICLE FOR THE PRESENCE OF A PINCH BOLT AND TORQUE THIS BOLT TO PROPER SPECIFICATIONS.