1995 Geo Metro

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Airbags & Restraints

Airbags & Restraints leads by volume: 34 of 109 complaints (31%) mention it.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category199519961997vs. 1995 Subcompact Cars
Annual fuel cost ($)1,550–2,2501,550–2,2501,550–2,250
Combined MPG28–4028–4028–40
City / Highway MPG26–37 / 31–4426–37 / 31–4426–37 / 31–44
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)222–317222–317222–317
Complaints filed1098863Not compared
Recalls issued101Not compared
Crash-involved complaints442813Not compared
Fire-involved complaints052Not compared
Injuries reported372612Not compared
Deaths reported010Not compared
Configurations compared333

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 1995 Geo Metro have?

1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 1995 Geo Metro?

Airbags & Restraints: 34 of 109 NHTSA complaints (31%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 1995 Geo Metro get?

EPA rates it 28–40 MPG combined across 3 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 1995 Geo Metro?

EPA estimates $1,550–$2,250 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (3)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Manual 5-spd31.0LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars37 mpg (high)44 mpg (high)40 mpg (high)$1,550 (low)222 g/mi (low)
Configuration 2Automatic 3-spd41.3LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars26 mpg (low)31 mpg (low)28 mpg (low)$2,250 (high)317 g/mi (high)
Configuration 3Manual 5-spd41.3LFront-Wheel DriveRegularSubcompact Cars33 mpg39 mpg35 mpg$1,800254 g/mi

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine40000
Transmission & Drivetrain42010
Fuel System20000
Electrical60000
Brakes136050
Steering73000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires93030
Airbags & Restraints34290260
Driver Assistance & Speed Control30000
Body, Seats & Latches3180110
Visibility & Lighting71000
Other20000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (1)

  • SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:DRUM · Campaign 94V213000 · Nov 2, 1994

    Defect: THE REAR BRAKE DRUMS WERE NOT CORRECTLY MACHINED. AS THE VEHICLE IS DRIVEN, LOSS OF WHEEL CLAMP LOAD CAN RESULT FROM THIS CONDITION. ONCE CLAMP LOAD IS LOST, ALL TIRE LOADS ARE DIRECTLY TAKEN BY THE WHEEL STUDS. THIS LOADING CAN CAUSE FATIGUE FAILURE OF THE WHEEL STUDS.

    Consequence: IF THIS OCCURS, A WHEEL COULD SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE, AND A CRASH COULD OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WARNING.

    Remedy: REPLACE REAR BRAKE DRUMS.