2002 BMW Z3

No photo available — body style shown for reference.

The Verdict

Worst problem area

Airbags & Restraints

Airbags & Restraints leads by volume: 3 of 6 complaints (50%) mention it.

Complaints filed fell from 27 in 2001 to 6 in 2002.

Data last changed . Sources: NHTSA complaints and recalls, EPA fuel economy data. Methodology

Advertisement

Cost, Fuel Economy & Complaint History

Fuel cost, fuel economy, and complaint history by model-yearScroll sideways to see all 3 years. Fuel figures show the range across trims for years with more than one EPA-rated configuration.
Category200020012002vs. 2002 Two Seaters
Annual fuel cost ($)3,900–4,1003,700–4,1003,700–4,100
Combined MPG19–2019–2119–21
City / Highway MPG17 / 24–2517–19 / 23–2617–19 / 23–26
CO₂ tailpipe (g/mi)444–468423–468423–468
Complaints filed50276Not compared
Recalls issued111Not compared
Crash-involved complaints600Not compared
Fire-involved complaints000Not compared
Injuries reported1110Not compared
Deaths reported100Not compared
Configurations compared666

Not compared: this database has no vehicle sales or registration figures, so a raw count mostly reflects how many were sold, not how safe the vehicle is.

Common questions

How many recalls does the 2002 BMW Z3 have?

1 NHTSA recall campaign as of Sep 16, 2026. Check your VIN with NHTSA to see whether one applies to your car.

What is the most common complaint about the 2002 BMW Z3?

Airbags & Restraints: 3 of 6 NHTSA complaints (50%) mention it.

What gas mileage does the 2002 BMW Z3 get?

EPA rates it 19–21 MPG combined across 6 configurations.

How much does it cost to fuel a 2002 BMW Z3?

EPA estimates $3,700–$4,100 a year in fuel costs, using EPA's assumptions.

EPA-Rated Configurations (6)

Every EPA-rated configuration on this page, one row each.A number tagged (low) or (high) is this page’s own cost-table figure of that name, above.
ConfigurationTransmissionCylindersDisplacementDrivetrainFuel TypeVehicle ClassCityHighwayCombinedAnnual Fuel CostCO₂
Configuration 1Automatic 5-spd63.0LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters17 mpg (low)25 mpg20 mpg$3,900444 g/mi
Configuration 2Manual 5-spd63.0LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters19 mpg (high)26 mpg (high)21 mpg (high)$3,700 (low)423 g/mi (low)
Configuration 3Manual 5-spd62.5LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters18 mpg25 mpg20 mpg$3,900444 g/mi
Configuration 4Automatic (S5)62.5LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters17 mpg (low)24 mpg20 mpg$3,900444 g/mi
Configuration 5Automatic 5-spd63.0LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters17 mpg (low)23 mpg (low)19 mpg (low)$4,100 (high)468 g/mi (high)
Configuration 6Manual 5-spd63.0LRear-Wheel DrivePremiumTwo Seaters19 mpg (high)26 mpg (high)21 mpg (high)$3,700 (low)423 g/mi (low)

Complaints by Category

Complaints by category, in the same fixed order on every page
CategoryComplaintsCrash-InvolvedFire-InvolvedInjuriesDeaths
Engine00000
Transmission & Drivetrain00000
Fuel System00000
Electrical10000
Brakes10000
Steering20000
Suspension, Wheels & Tires00000
Airbags & Restraints30000
Driver Assistance & Speed Control00000
Body, Seats & Latches00000
Visibility & Lighting10000
Other00000

A complaint that names more than one category is counted in each, so the rows can add up to more than the total number of complaints.

Recalls (1)

  • EXTERIOR LIGHTING · Campaign 06E026000 · Mar 23, 2006

    Defect: CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.

    Consequence: WITHOUT THE AMBER REFLECTORS, THE VEHICLE WILL BE POORLY ILLUMINATED, POSSIBLY RESULTING IN A VEHICLE CRASH WITHOUT WARNING.

    Remedy: PRO-A MOTORS WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND OFFER TO REPURCHASE THE LAMPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON APRIL 3, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT PRO-A MOTORS AT 323-838-2988.